[2026:RJ-JP:10862] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1784/2026 1. Suraj Mehto S/o Mantu Mehto, Age 30 Years, R/o Village Naya Tola Kalyani Post Maharajpura Police Station-Taljhori Marajpura District Sahebganj Jharkhand (At Present Confined Central Jail Jaipur Raj.) 2. Sekh Sobrati S/o Sekh Sabeet, Age 30 Years, R/o Village Moti Jharna Post Maharajpura Police Station Taljhari District Sahebganj Jharkhand (At Present Confined Central Jail Jaipur Raj.) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 16/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 1206/2025 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City(South) for the offence(s) under Section(s) 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 13.01.2026. He further submits that charge-sheet against the accused-petitioners has already been filed. He further submits that the alleged offence(s) is triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial will take [2026:RJ-JP:10862] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1784/2026] its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners in custody and therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties that the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since 13.01.2026 and charge-sheet against the accused- petitioners has already been filed. The alleged offence(s) is triable by Magistrate and trial will take its own time. Without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners namely Suraj Mehto S/o Mantu Mehto and Sekh Sobrati S/o Sekh Sabeet are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not be involved in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. [2026:RJ-JP:10862] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1784/2026] 7. In case of any breach of the afore-mentioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner(s) for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /66