Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6779 (PNJ)

JASANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/4726/2026 · 2026-04-27

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-4726 IN THE (156) JASANDE STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o official respon petitioners at t representation 2. submitted tha 20.04.2026 be raising their gr not yet been c submitted tha 4726-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH ANDEEP KAUR AND ANOTHER Versus OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. B.S. Beniwal, Advocate for Mr. Suman Beniwal, Advocate fo Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryan ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fi tion of India seeking issuance of a w respondents No.2 and 3 to protect rs at the hands of respondents No.4 to tation dated 20.04.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned co d that the petitioners have recentl 26 before the Superintendent of Poli heir grievances as mentioned in the pr been considered and no action has b d that at this stage, the petitioners wo NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH CRWP-4726-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.04.2026 HER ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA  cate for the petitioner aryana een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the protect the life and liberty of the o.4 to 11 and to take action on their ure P-7). ed counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on f Police, Fatehabad (Annexure P-7) the present petition but the same has has been taken thereon. He further ers would be satisfied if appropriate ners f the g the the their has on ) e has rther riate AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.27 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4726 directions are Fatehabad to d take necessary 3. 4. behalf of the r due course. Le course of the d 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid repre within a perio accordance w petitioners, the order to protec  27.04.2026 Amit Sharma 4726-2026 (O&M) (2) s are issued to respondent No. to decide the aforesaid representati ary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Har f the respondents-State and submits th rse. Let a complete set of the paperboo f the day. In view of the limited prayer ma ting anything on the merits of the of at this stage with a direction to r d representation dated 20.04.2026 (An period of 15 days from today, by nce with law. Needless to say, if rs, the official respondents would pro protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:    t No.2-Superintendent of Police, sentation filed by the petitioners and , Haryana has advance notice on mits that the needful will be done in erbook be supplied to her during the yer made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is on to respondent No.2 to decide the 26 (Annexure P-7) of the petitioners y, by passing a speaking order in ay, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE  ned:- Yes/No   lice, and e on ne in g the thout n is e the ners er in the ity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.27 17:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.