Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6779 (CHH)

MANOJ MISHRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

REVP/62/2026 · 2026-04-21

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:CGHC:18452 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 62 of 2026 1 - Manoj Mishra S/o Late Brijesh Mishra Aged About 43 Years R/o Vijaypuram Colony Sarkanda Tehsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Home Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya P.S, And Post Rakhi Atal Nagar Nava Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Superintendent Of Police District- Bilaspur (C.G.) Office At Nehru Chowk Tehsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Station House Officer Police Station Sarkanda Tehsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Shri Nilesh Pandey Then The Town Inspector/ Incharge Police Station Sarkanda (Presently Line Attachaed) Bilaspur C.G. Through Superintendent Of Police District- Bilaspur C.G 5 - Rajesh Mishra S/o Late Lalta Prasad Mishra Aged About 60 Years R/o Shri Ramkrishna Enclave Near Sudha Sales Nutan Chowk Block- No.102, Sarkanda Tehsil And District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Bajpai & Ms. Pooja Sinha, Advocate. For State : Mr. Krishna Gopal Yadav, Dy. Govt. Advocate & Mr. Manish Kashyap, Panel Lawyer. For Resp. No. 4 : Mr. Sameer Rigri, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate. For Resp. No. 5 : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 22/04 /2026 1. It has been informed before this Court that during pendency of this petition, a settlement has been arrived at between the parties today i.e. 22.04.2026. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the parties have settled their dispute, therefore, the petitioner is not inclined to ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Digitally signed by ARUN KUMAR DEWANGAN Date: 2026.04.22 17:10:19 +0530 proceed further with the instant review petition. 3. In view of the aforesaid submission as well as the settlement arrived at between the parties on 22.04.2026, the instant review petition is disposed of. 4. The compromise deed dated 22.04.2026 arrived at between the parties which has been submitted by respondent No. 5 through covering memo is taken on record. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun