HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32363 of 2026 Court No. - 66 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Roshan Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 01/2025, Under Sections- 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 238, 3(5) B.N.S., Police Station Binauli, District Baghpat, during the pendency of the trial. 3. This is a second bail application. 4. First bail application no.10709 of 2026 was rejected by this court on 21.05.2026. 5. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the first bail application of the applicant was rejected on the ground that his role is distinguishable from the co-accused Krishna, who had been released on bail by this court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.943 of 2026 on 27.01.2026. It is further submitted that correct fact is that from the record, it is clear that role of the applicant Krishna is absolutely similar and nature of evidence are also similar as on pointing out of the applicant as well as the co-accused Krishna, alleged body of deceased was recovered after being exhumed from pit and two blood stained sickles were recovered from the applicant as well as the co- accused Krishna but while arguing the first bail application, the earlier counsel could not bring on record the correct fact before this Court, for that reason, the first bail application of the applicant was rejected Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohit .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) on 21.05.2026. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. It is further submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the present case, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. The role of the applicant is similar to the co- accused, Krishna, therefore, applicant is also entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity with Krishna. It is further submitted that charges were framed on 23.05.2025 but till date, not a single witness has been examined, therefore, trial is not likely to be concluded in near future. The applicant is languishing in jail since 03.01.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 6. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, parity of the applicant with co-accused Krishna, who has been released on bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.943 of 2026 and taking into account overcrowded jails and heavy pendency of criminal cases before the trial courts as well as considering the mandate of the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan vs Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 3038 as well as guideline of this Court in the case of Maya Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2024 SCC Online All 6765 regarding grant of bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the present application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Rohit, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. BAIL No. 32363 of 2026 2 iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. 11. Verification of mobile number and Aadhaar card of the applicant as well as sureties should be verified by the court concerned. 12. It is made clear that the applicant shall be released on the basis of computer generated copy of this order, downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad and verified by the concerned counsel with the undertaking that the certified copy will be filed within 15 days. 13. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. 14. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through Baghpat Jail Superintendent via e-mail or on e-prison portal and Trial Court via e-mode within 24 hours in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685 as well as Pila Pahan @ Peela Pahan and others Vs. State of Jharkhand and another, in Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 169 of 2025, decided on 29.05.2026. September 14, 2026 S.C. BAIL No. 32363 of 2026 3 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad