- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23656 CRL.RP No. 579 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.579 OF 2023 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS) BETWEEN: SRI M KRISHNA REDDY, S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO. 102, SHIVANAPURA POST, KEMPAMMADEVINAGARA, DASANAPURA HOBLI, BANGALORE-562123. AND ALSO AT NO.99/1, 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM OPP. SRIMATH ANDAVAN ASHRAMA, BANGALORE-560 020. …PETITIONER (BY SRI AKRAM PASHA K, ADVOCATE –ABSENT PETITIONER IS PRESENT) AND: SRI K RAGHAVENDRA S/O T. KRISHANPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, HAVING OFFICE AT NO.18, 1ST FLOOR, Y.M. GOPALAPPA BUILDING, B.B ROAD, YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560 064. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI MURTHY K, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23656 CRL.RP No. 579 of 2023 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE HON’BLE XIII ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BANGALORE, IN C.C.NO.14961/2017, BY ORDER DATED 15.10.2022 AND IN CRL.A.NO.1373/2022 PASSED BY THE HONBLE LIX ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH- 60) AT BANGALORE, DATED 01.04.2023. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Heard Sri M. Krishna Reddy, who is the revision petitioner as Sri Akram Pasha, learned Counsel failed to appear before the Court. 2. It is noted that revision petitioner himself is a practicing Advocate. After addressing the arguments for some time, he files a memo which reads as under “I, the petitioner prays that and admit that to pay the balance amount as per Court order within 03 months from the date of this Court order.” 3. Counsel for respondent has endorsed no objection on the memo. 4. Placing the memo on record, petition stands disposed of. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:23656 CRL.RP No. 579 of 2023 5. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant/respondent under due identification. 6. Balance amount of compensation if not paid as agreed, petitioner shall undergo imprisonment ordered by the learned Trial Magistrate, confirmed by the First Appellate Court. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 79