SANJEEV KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
WPCRL/84/2022 · 2026-06-11
Alok Mahra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6774 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6774 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:4705 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL/84/2022
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
No representation for the applicant though called twice.
2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Pramod Tiwari land Mr. Jay Prakash Kandpal, learned Brief Holders for the State.
3. Learned State counsel would submit that, during the pendency of the present petition, the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.
4. In view of the aforesaid subsequent development, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Alok Mahra, J.)
11.06.2026 Mamta