Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6773 (UTT)

MANOJ BHATT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/63/2026 · 2026-06-11

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA NO.63 of 2026 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Divya Jain, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Pramod Tiwari land Mr. Jay Prakash Kandpal, learned Brief Holders for the State. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that during the pendency of the present anticipatory bail application, the investigation has been concluded and charge-sheet has already been submitted before the competent court. In view thereof, the applicant does not wish to press the present anticipatory bail application. 5. Learned State counsel does not dispute the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed in the matter. 6. In view of the aforesaid and as the learned counsel for the applicant does not wish to press the present anticipatory bail application, the same is dismissed as not pressed/infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 11.06.2026 Mamta MA MTA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f 244f3e584af1449e430ef900 bf09a6d67ebbd642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1 d9cabfd54852c9e68911ca8b 66dd26690a191648ab5d8dd 004ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2026.06.12 12:00:36 +05'30'