HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13537 of 2026 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Mahendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri B.P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 335 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115(2), 64, 143, 144 of B.N.S. and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Meja, District Prayagraj, during the pendency of the trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case though there is no incriminating material against him. It is further submitted that as per allegations in the first information report, she was tortured in connection with demand of dowry and the victim in her statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS has stated that she was sold by two co- accused persons to the applicant and the applicant committed rape on her and the victim is a major lady aged about 22 years. It is further submitted that the medico legal report does not support the allegation of commission rape on her and there is no mention of any date, time and place of incident. It is further submitted that the applicant is having no criminal history and the applicant has been languishing in jail since 11.02.2026, in case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mahendra Singh, Rakesh Kumar Tiwari, Ram Prakash Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Satish Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and it has been submitted by him that the victim in her statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS has stated that she was sold by two co- accused persons to the applicant and the applicant committed rape on her. 6. As per first information report, the victim was subjected to cruelty of her in laws and she was thrown out from her matrimonial home, however, the victim in her statement recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS has stated that she was sold by two co-accused persons to the applicant and the applicant committed rape on her and the victim is a major lady aged about 22 years. It is further submitted that the medico legal report does not support the allegation of commission rape on her and there is no mention of any date, time and place of incident. It is further submitted that the applicant is having no criminal history and the applicant has been languishing in jail since 11.02.2026. 7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and taking into account overcrowded jails and heavy pendency of criminal cases before the trial courts as well as considering the mandate of the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan vs Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 3038 as well as guideline of this Court in the case of Maya Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2024 SCC Online All 6765 regarding grant of bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 8. Accordingly, the present application is ALLOWED. 9. Let the applicant- Satish Yadav involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police BAIL No. 13537 of 2026 2 officer or tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. (iv) The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 11. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Verification of mobile number and Aadhaar card of the applicant as well as sureties should be verified by the court concerned. 12. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to ensure early release of the applicant. 13. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through Jail Superintendent, Prayagraj via e-mail or e-prison portal within 24 hours in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685. September 14, 2026 RKM BAIL No. 13537 of 2026 3 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad