Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 67719 (MAD)

S.M. Raju v. THE INSPECTOR OF GENERAL

WP/3821/2026 · 2026-02-12

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 3821 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 eIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 3821 of 2026 S.M. Raju S/o. Late. Munirathinam No.2/338-10, Kalaignar Nagar, Choodapuram Village, Belathur Post, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Inspector Of General Registration Department, Chennai. 2. The District Registrar, Krishnagiri Registration District, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Hosur Taluk Krishnagiri District. 4. The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Hosur. 5. Village Administrative Officer, Belathur, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. 6. Rajamma, D/o. Munusamy @ Chinna Munusamy, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3821 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 Mylandahalli, Kudiyanur, Kolar Kundenoor, Karnataka 563130. 7. Chinnanna, S/o. Munusamy @ Chinna Munusamy, No. 2/192, Choodapuram, Belathur, Krishnagiri 635124. 8. Subramaniyam, S/o. Munusamy @ Chinna Munusamy, No. 2/78, Choodapuram, Belathur, Hosur, Krishnagiri 635124 9. Chandramma, D/o. Munusamy @ Chinna Munusamy, No. 2/8, Nadu Choodapuram, Bethalur,Hosur,Krishnagiri 635124 10.Govindan S/o. Munusamy @ Chinna Munusamy No. 2/209-1, Choodapuram, Bethalur, Hosur, Krishnagiri 635124. 11.Krishnan, S/o. Munusamy @ Chinna Munusamy No.2/203, Nadu Choodapuram, Bethalur, Hosur, Krishnagiri 635124 12.Venkatesh, S/o. Munusamy @ Chinna Munusamy No.95-1, Choodapuram, Bethalur, Hosur, Krishnagiri 635124 13.Nagamma, W/o. Narayanappa (Late), No. 2/200 C, Choodapuram, Belathur, Hosur, Krishnagiri 635124. 14.Manjula D/o. Narayanappa (Late), No.110, Car Street, 8th Devaspet, Doddaballapura, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3821 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 Bangalore Rural, Karnataka 561 203. 15.Geetha D/o. Narayanappa (Late), No. 2/200 C, Choodapuram, Belathur, Hosur,Krishnagiri 635124 16.Nirmala D/o. Narayanappa (Late), No.256, Temple Street, Near Sri Rama Temple, Sarjapura, Bangalore, Karnataka 562 125. 17.Santhakumari, W/o. Varadharaju, No. 47K, Dommasandra Bidarahalli Hobli, Kurudusonnenahalli, Virgonagar, South Bangalore, Karnataka 560 049. 18.Parvathi, W/o. Appaji, 4th Block, Masjid Road, Old Town, Bethamangala, Kolar,Karnataka 563 116. 19.Padma, W/o.Anil Kumar, Ward 9, Maruti Extension, Malur Town, Near Tirumala Choultry, Kolar, Karnataka 563 130 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st to 4th respondents to consider the petitioners representation dated 06.01.2026 and take appropriate https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3821 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 action on the fraudulent Partition Deed vide Doc. No.12447/2023dated 06.07.2023on the file of the Sub Register office, Hosur which was executed without including all lawful legal heirs, based on a forged Family Tree Certificate. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Mohammed Aseef For Respondent(s): Mr.U.Baranidharan, Special Government Pleader for R1 to R5 ******** ORDER Alleging that respondents 7 and 8 relied on a false family tree and registered partition deed dated 06.07.2023, after submitting multiple representations seeking cancellation thereof, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. Mr.U.Baranidharan, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice for respondents 1 to 5. Adverting to the representations, he submits that the petitioner has requested for cancellation, and that such power of cancellation is not vested in the registering officer. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3821 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 3. From the averments in the affidavit, it appears that there is a title dispute in respect of the property and the petitioner alleges that partition deed dated 06.07.2023 was executed and registered on the basis of an incorrect family tree. Evidently, there are disputed questions of fact which could be appropriately adjudicated through a trial process in a civil court. Leaving it open to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional civil court for relief, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 12-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To 1. The Inspector Of General Registration Department, Chennai. 2. The District Registrar, Krishnagiri Registration District, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Hosur Taluk Krishnagiri District. 4. The Sub-Registrar, Sub-Registrar Office, Hosur. 5. Village Administrative Officer, Belathur, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3821 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 3821 of 2026 12-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis