Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 677 (JHR)

BAHADUR TUDU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2014/2026 · 2026-03-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:7097) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2014 of 2026 ------ Bahadur Tudu, aged about 24 years, S/o –Pahalod Tudu, R/o Village –Koldih, P.O.+P.S. –Karon, District –Deoghar. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 16.03.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.03 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under sections 319(2)/318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 66B/66C/66D and 84C of the I.T. Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cyber-crime and mobile handsets with sim cards were recovered from the petitioners, which were used in creating several e-wallets on the basis of the forged sim cards. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 22 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 07.01.2026, as mentioned in para 22 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused – Rais Ansari has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 13.03.2026 in B.A. No. 1867 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge II cum Special Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 16.03.2026 Sonu/