KRISHNA LOHRA ALIAS PANDI ALLIAS KRISHNA LOHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3317/2026 · 2026-04-21
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6769 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6769 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:11670] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. no. 3317 of 2026
Krishna Lohra @ Krishna Lohar, about 28 years, son of Harku Lohra, resident of Zone No. 06, Near Kali Mandir, Ρ.Ο. and PS. Birsanagar, Town Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. J.N.Upadhyay , Adv. For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind , Addl.. PP
02 / 21.04.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kadma P. S. case no. 96 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed robbery and looted gold jewellery, watch and idols of God made up of gold and silver. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and without putting the petitioner on TIP, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 14 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 18.10.2025, as mentioned in para 11 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to
annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jamshedpur in connection with Kadma P. S. case no. 96 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 21.04.2026
Smita/-