Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 67679 (MAD)

M.Ramadurai v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/4252/2022 · 2026-02-16

C Kumarappan, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MHC:656 WP No. 4252 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN W.P.No.4252 of 2022 M.Ramadurai ..Petitioner -vs- 1. The District Collector Office of the District Collector, Perambalur. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Perambalur Revenue Division, Perambalur. 3. The Tahsildar Kunnam Taluk Office, Kunnam, Perambalur District. 4. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Block Development Office, Veppur, Perambalur District. 5. Mr.Ashokan 6. Murugesan ..Respondent(s) Prayer: To direct the 1st respondent to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 10.08.2020 on merits and accordance with law within a reasonable time as may be determined by the Honorable Court For Petitioner: Ms.SWETHA RAMESH FOR MR.D.Ashokkumar https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4252 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 4 For Respondent(s): MR.T.ARUN KUMAR, AGP for R1 to 4 MR.S.RANJITH KUMARAN FOR MR.R.PRABAKAR FOR R5. ***** O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by C.Kumarappan J.) The present Writ Petition has been filed, directing the 1st respondent to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 10.08.2020 on merits and in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 5th respondent has encroached upon lands in S.F.Nos.416 and 418/49. Though the petitioner has sent a representation on 10.08.2020 for removal of encroachment, no steps have been taken so far. Hence, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for R1 to R4 drew our attention to the counter statement filed by the Tahsildar, wherein it has been stated that as per revenue records, S.F.Nos.416 and 418/49 are classified as Street and there is no encroachment made by anyone as per the contention of the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4252 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 4 4. In view of the above statement of the Tahsildar, the present Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 16-02-2026 Index: Yes Speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes AR To: 1. The District Collector Office of the District Collector, Perambalur. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer Perambalur Revenue Division, Perambalur. 3. The Tahsildar Kunnam Taluk Office, Kunnam, Perambalur District. 4. The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Block Development Office, Veppur, Perambalur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 4252 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J. AR W.P.No.4252 of 2022 16-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis