[2026:RJ-JP:14077] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6030/2026 Bajrang Lal Swami Son Of Shri Ram Pal Swami, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Village Ghareda Post Kookar, Tehsil Todaraisingh, District Tonk, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. The Collector, District Tonk, Rajasthan 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Sdo), Todaraisingh, District Kekri, Rajasthan 4. The Tehsildar, Todaraisingh, District Kekri, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Ojla HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 06/04/2026 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:- "It is, therefore, in the facts & circumstances of the case as mentioned herein above it is most humbly prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly accept and allow this writ petition and the respondent department be directed to remove the illegal / unauthorized encroachment made upon the Government land of the village – Ghareda, District – Tonk. Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the Petitioner.” [2026:RJ-JP:14077] (2 of 2) [CW-6030/2026] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present matter, petitioner has submitted a representation before the District Collector, District Tonk, Rajasthan, however, no heed was paid to the said representation by the authorities concerned. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present writ petition be disposed of in the light of the order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018] with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Public Land Protection Cell (hereinafter referred to as ‘PLPC’) constituted in compliance of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra). 4. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra) with a direction to the petitioner to file a representation before the PLPC. It is further directed that the PLPC shall decide the representation(s), if any, filed by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s representation and in no manner is to be construed as a direction to decide the said representation in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DANISH USMANI /19