( 2026:JHHC:11101 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 1705 of 2026 Ram Lohra, aged about 25 years, son of late Parsnath Lohra @ Late Parsnath Lohara, resident of village -Sisai Bans Toli, P.O. and P.S. Sisai, District-Gumla, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner :Mr. Soumitra Baroi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, A.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Ajeet Kr. Singh, Advocate 02/ 17.04.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sisai P.S. Case No. 45 of 2025, registered under sections 115(2), 88, 89, 64, 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of BNS and section 4/6 of POCSO Act, pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, POCSO Court-cum-Addl. Sessions Judge- IV, Gumla. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He next submits that the petitioner and informant came into contact on 06.01.2024 and they met several times in different places and physical relationship has been established with consent. He further submits that petitioner has been appointed as a constable in C.R.P.F and appointment letter has been issued on 23.12.2024 and present F.I.R. has been lodged on 24.04.2025. By way of drawing the attention of the Court to Whatsapp chat, he submits that even the informant has threatened the petitioner that he should come to her place otherwise he would implicate him in a case. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsels for the State and informant oppose the prayer and submit that allegations are there of establishing physical ( 2026:JHHC:11101 ) relationship on the pretext of marriage. Learned counsel for the informant also submits that even at the instance of the petitioner, pregnancy has been terminated and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Looking into contents of F.I.R. it transpires that petitioner and informant came into contact on 06.01.2024 and they met several times in different places. So far pregnancy is concerned, that is of 10.10.2024 and F.I.R has been lodged on 24.04.2025. The petitioner has been appointed as a constable in C.R.P.F. Whatsapp chat suggests that the informant has threatened the petitioner that he should come to her place otherwise she would implicate him in a case. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and the learned court shall release the petitioner on terms and conditions and sureties as learned court deems fit and proper. 7. This anticipatory bail application is disposed of. Dt.17.04.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-