Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6762 (CHH)

RAKESH SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRA/2433/2025 · 2026-04-21

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:18376 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRA No. 2433 of 2025 Rakesh Sahu S/o Late Chhedilal Sahu Aged About 25 Years R/o Irrigation Colony, Rampur, Police Station Civil Line Rampur, District- Korba (C.G) --- Appellant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chowki Cseb Police Station Kotwali, District- Korba (C.G.) --- Respondent CRA No. 2477 of 2025 Rakesh Sahu S/o Late Chedilal Sahu Aged About 25 Years R/o Irrigation Colony, Rampur, Police Station - Civil Line Rampur, District Korba Chhattisgarh ---Appellant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chowki C S E B, Police Station Kotwali, District - Korba Chhattisgarh --- Respondent For Appellant : Shri Prashant Sahu and Shri Shreshth Gupta, Advocates. For Respondent/State : Shri Vivek Mishra, P.L. (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Order on Board 22/04/2026 1. The present appeal i.e., CRA No. 2477/2025 filed on 04.11.2025 and subsequent appeal CRA No. 2433/2025 filed on 13.11.2025 are arising out of same judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26.09.2025 passed by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act) Korba, Dist. Korba in N.D.P.S. Act Case No. 13/2024. Previously filed appeal i.e., CRA No. 2477/2025 has been preferred by the same appellant, namely, Rakesh Sahu through High Digitally signed by ALLENA ANJANI KUMAR Date: 2026.04.22 17:29:13 +0530 2 Court Legal Services Committee, which engaged the counsel Shri Shreshtha Gupta whereas subsequent appeal, i.e., CRA No. 2433/2025 has been filed on behalf of same appellant through counsel Shri Prashant Sahu. Since two appeals against the same judgment of conviction and sentence are not maintainable, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the subsequent appeal, i.e., CRA No. 2433/2025 is liable to be disposed of as not maintainable and the CRA No.2477/2025 is maintainable. However, Shri Prashant Sahu, Advocate is permitted to appear in CRA No.2477/2025 along with Shri Shreshtha Gupta, Advocate. 2. In view of above, CRA No. 2433/2025 is disposed of as not maintainable. Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE Anjani