Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6761 (ALL)

HARENDRA BALIYAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

WRIC/35013/2026 · 2026-09-10

Satya Veer Singh, Saurabh Dwivedi Registrar J Cpc

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35013 of 2026 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE ARINDAM SINHA, J. HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J. 1. Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client by representation dated 17th August, 2026 applied for security. There be direction upon respondent no. 2 (the District Magistrate) to consider it. 2. Mr. Amit Manohar, learned advocate, Additional Chief Standing Counsel appears for State. He submits, the representation will be duly dealt with. 3. We do not deem it necessary to notice private respondents. This is because we direct respondent no. 2 to consider petitioner's representation dated 17th August, 2026. Said respondent may notice private respondents, if necessary. Petitioner will communicate certified copy of this order along with copy of his application to said respondent. Decision taken be informed to petitioner within three weeks thereof. 4. The writ petition is disposed of. September 11, 2026 Jaswant Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Arindam Sinha,J.) (Satya Veer Singh,J.) Harendra Baliyan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad