[2026:RJ-JP:7986] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1859/2026 Molana Hasim S/o Ghaseeta, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Sahanka, Police Station, Sikri, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan). (Presently Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Aamir Khan, Mr. Utkal Pandey, Ms. Chanchal & Mr. Aarif Mohammed For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 19/02/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with F.I.R. No.176/2010 registered at Police Station Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 420 & 406 I.P.C. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is a permanent resident of Sikari, Distt. Bharatpur and has never left the said place as well as he was not aware of the pendency of the criminal case against him, therefore his non-appearance before the concerned Court was not deliberate. 3. Learned counsel also submits that the case is triable by Court of Magistrate; the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, he is in custody [2026:RJ-JP:7986] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1859/2026] since long. He further submits that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter; no recovery is required to be made from him and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that the petitioner has been absconding since 2011 and has been arrested after 15 years pursuant to the standing warrant issued against him. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent; the case is triable by a Court of Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed in the matter and trial will considerably take long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Therefore, the instant bail application is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Molana Hasim S/o Ghaseeta, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/-, out of which one surety should be a close relative of the petitioner, each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the following conditions:- (i) The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The accused-petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. [2026:RJ-JP:7986] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1859/2026] (iii) The accused-petitioner shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial Court or as and when he is asked to appear before the Trial Court. 7. The accused-petitioner is directed to mark his presence in every 1st (first) and 3rd (third) week of every month before the concerned Police Station. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner to the Trial Court on the same day of every month. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move an application against the petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SAHIL SONI /52