Rajeswari (Deceased) v. T.V.K. Vasudevaraj (Deceased) 1. V. Sekar @ Rajasekar
CMP/4241/2025 · 2026-02-05
V Lakshminarayanan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 67532 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 67532 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMP No. 4241 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN CMP No. 4241 of 2025 IN SA NO. 434 OF 2008 Rajeswari (Deceased) D/o. Boopalachandran, Bharathiyar St, Arani Town, Tiruvannamalai Dt. ..Appellant(s) Vs T.V.K. Vasudevaraj (Deceased)
1. V. Sekar @ Rajasekar S/o. T.V.K. VAsudevaraj, 22/2, Bharathiar St, Arani Town 632 301.
2. V. Rajkumar S/o. T.V.K. Vasudevaraj, 22/2, Bharathiar St, Arani Town 632 301.
3. V. V. Christopher @ Selvanathan S/o. T.V.K. VAsudevaraj, 22/2, Bharathiar St, Arani Town 632 301. (Deceased)
4. Municipal Commissioner Arani Municipal Office, Arani.
5. Asst. Divisional Engineer Town Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Arani. Manickammal (Deceased)
6. T.V.K. Jayasakthi S/o. T.V.K. Kuppusamy, Dhandhumariamman Koil St, Arani.
7. T.V.K. Bell Chandran __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 4241 of 2008 S/o. T.V.K. Kuppusamy, V.A.K. Nagar, Arani. T.V.K. Radha Bai (Deceased)
8. T.V.K. Rajeswari S/o. Captain Subramani, II Street, Gandhi Nagar, Arani.
9. Luri Premavathy D/o. Late. T.V.K. Vasudevaraj, 22/2, Bharathiar St, Arani Town 632 301. 10.Grace Padmavathy D/o. Late. T.V.K. Vasudevaraj, 22/2, Bharathiar St, Arani Town 632 301. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER – This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to condone the delay of 5456 days in filing the petition to bring the legal heirs Representatives of the deceased 1st Respondent TVK Vasudevaraj viz. proposed Respondents 9 and 10 herein on record in the above SA. For Petitioner(s): Mrs.D.Kamatchi O R D E R This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed to condone the delay is absolutely unnecessary. Some of the legal heirs of the deceased 1st respondent are already on record as respondents 1 – 3. When there is no question of abatement, the question of delay does not arise. __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 4241 of 2008 2.Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. 05-02-2026 Index: Yes/No (1/6) Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GSA __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 4241 of 2008 V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J. GSA CMP No. 4236 of 2025 in SA NO. 434 OF 2008 05-02-2026 (1/6) __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis