Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6753 (JHR)

AKASH ORAON ALLIAS AKSH ORAON v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2949/2026 · 2026-04-17

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:11187 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2949 of 2026 ------ Akash Oraon @ Aksh Oraon aged about 22 years, son of Umesh Oraon, resident of Village-Pokhraha Khurd, P.O& P.S Sadar Daltonganj, District-Palamau, Jharkhand ….. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ----- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-17-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No.214 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 309 (4) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery and looted a laptop. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. yet without putting him on Test Identification Parade, charge-sheet has been submitted against him as has been mentioned in para-9 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of C.C.T.V. Footage. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.01.2026 as has been mentioned in para-17 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 07.04.2026 in B.A. No.735 of 2026. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Palamau at Daltonganj in connection with Chhattarpur P.S. Case No.214 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-17.04.2026-Abha/