28.01.2026 Serial no. 45 [G.S.D] CRM (M) 2752 of 2025 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Kotwali Police Station Case No. 954 of 2025 dated 25.08.2025 under Section 103 of the BNS and charge- sheet filed u/s 103(1)/253/61(2) of the BNS and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act. -And- In the matter of : Raghvendra Pratap Singh … Petitioner(s) Mr. Sumanta Das … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Jaydeep Biswas … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Sourav Mukherjee … for the defacto-complainant Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an employee of BSF and has been arrested from the BSF camp. According to the learned advocate, so far as the allegations against the present petitioner is concerned, the same is because of the petitioner who happens to be the father of the principal accused and the subject-matter of the case relates to the principal accused who fired at his girl friend and killed her. Mr. Biswas, learned advocate, appearing for the State submits that there are materials against the present petitioner for aiding his son for staying at the guest house and also for booking another guest house where funds have been transmitted using the name of the present petitioner. 2 But, in course of the investigation, it was found that the same was signed by the principal accused being the son of the present petitioner. This court confronted the learned advocate for the State to the extent that whether fire arm was procured at the behest of the present petitioner or not. To this, it was responded by the State that materials are not available in the case diary to support such contention. Having considered the other aspects of the case and without entering into the merits relating to the conspiracy, I am of the view that since the trial of the case is in progress and there is no impediment created by the present petitioner, further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Raghvendra Pratap Singh shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Krishnanagar, Nadia. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned court in seisin of the case and shall not leave the 3 district of Nadia without prior intimation to the learned court in seisin of the case. Accordingly, CRM(M) 2752 of 2025 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)