Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6750 (CAL)

BHAJA HARI MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/18896/2025 · 2026-02-10

Bivas Pattanayak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

10.02.2026 Sl. No.66 Ct. No.14 ss IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. No. 18896 of 2025 Bhaja Hari Mondal Versus The State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Sudipa Banerjee …for the Petitioner. Ms. Jayeta Mitra (Kaunda) …for the State. 1. Affidavit-of-service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. By the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks direction upon the respondent authorities for disbursement of interest on delayed payment of gratuity and arrear pension amount from the date following the date of his retirement till the date of actual payment @ 18% per annum in his favour. 3. The petitioner contends that he was an Assistant Teacher of Bandhi Primary School, P.O. Muktipur, District Birbhum. The petitioner retired from service on superannuation on 31st January, 2020. The pension payment order was issued on 13th December, 2020. The gratuity and arrear pension amount was disbursed on 18th February, 2021. However, no interest on delayed payment of gratuity and arrear 2 pension amount has been paid. Hence, this writ petition. 4. Ms. Sudipa Banerjee, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that since there was delay in disbursement of the gratuity and arrear pension amount, the petitioner is entitled to interest from the date following the date of his retirement till the date of actual payment. 5. Ms. Jayeta Mitra (Kaunda), learned Advocate for the State leaves the matter to the discretion of the Court. 6. It is found from the contention in the writ petition that there is delay in disbursement of the gratuity and arrear pension amount. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to interest on the aforesaid amount. 7. Accordingly, the respondent No.2, Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance as well as respondent no.3, Treasury Officer, Birbhum-II is directed to disburse interest @ 8% per annum on the arrear pension amount in favour of the petitioner from the date following the date of his retirement till the date of actual payment, within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this order. 8. Learned Advocate for the petitioner is directed to communicate this order to the respondent No.2 Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance and the respondent no.3, Treasury Officer, Birbhum-II, for necessary compliance. 3 9. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition being WPA 18896 of 2025 stands disposed of. 10. Since no affidavits have been called for, the allegation made in the writ petition is deemed to be not admitted. 11. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 12. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. 13. There shall be no order as to costs. 14. All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)