Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9202] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal 2nd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3561/2026 Rajendra S/o Prahlad, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ratanpura, Police Station Nasirda, District Tonk (At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain, Mr. Avinash Dhanju For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 27/02/2026
1. This second bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 0091/2025 registered at Police Station Nasirda, District Tonk for offence under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 229(1) and 61(2) of BNS 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the accused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the challan papers.
4.
Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 04.11.2025. He further submits that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in
[2026:RJ-JP:9202] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3561/2026] the matter and offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are triable by Magistrate. He also submits that trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused- petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that offences alleged against the accused-petitioner are triable by the Magistrate so also the fact that he is in custody since 04.11.2025 and police after completion of the investigation has submitted charge-sheet, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. Accordingly, the second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /330 S