Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 67487 (MAD)

KALAM @ ABDUL KALAM v. The State represented by

CRL OP/1810/2026 · 2026-01-28

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No. 1810 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No. 1810 of 2026 Kalam @ Abdul Kalam ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Avadi Police Station Avadi District Crime No. 746 of 2025. ...Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No. 746 of 2025 on the file of respondent police seeks bail. For Petitioner : Ms.S.Vedavalli For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.11.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 125, 324(2), 309(4), 311, and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 746 of 2025 on the file of respondent police seeks bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 1810 of 2026 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that on 12.11.2025 at about 4.00 pm, the petitioner waylaid the de-facto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.2,000/- and a Vivo Y22 mobile phone from him. Hence, the case has been registered and the petitioner has been arrested on 13.11.2025. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he was arrested and remanded to judicial custody from 13.11.2025 and now, he is ready to abide by any condition imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is having 18 previous cases are similar in nature and therefore, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is having 18 previous cases are similar nature and if bail is granted to the petitioner he would indulge similar in nature, hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 1810 of 2026 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition shall stands dismissed. 28.01.2026 MSM To 1.The Inspector of Police, J8, Neelangarai Police Station In Crime No. 726 of 2025 Chengalpattu. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No. 1810 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR J. MSM Crl.O.P.No. 1810 of 2026 28.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis