Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6746 (CAL)

NARASINGHA SAHOO v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/26992/2024 · 2026-01-08

Kausik Chanda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

08.01.2026 ML- 707 AMR Ct.No.15 WPA 26992 of 2024 Sri Narasingha Sahoo -vs.- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Md. Salahuddin Mr. Kumaresh Dalal …for the Petitioner Mr. Malyasree Maity Mr. Fardeen Hossain …for the Respondent no. 10 Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the respondent no. 10 has undertaken construction of a residential building without any sanctioned from the Panchayat. Learned advocate appearing for the respondent no. 10 has produced the sanctioned plan before this Court. Therefore, the allegation of the writ petitioner is not substantiated. Accordingly, writ petition being WPA 26992 of 2024 is dismissed. Let a copy of the sanctioned plan be kept with the record. 2 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Kausik Chanda, J.)