APHC010361572026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday, the 27th The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 19258 of 2026 Between: Kaluvayi Ramareddi The State of Andhra Pradesh and Counsel for the petitioner: 1. Navuluru Krishna Sai Counsel for the respondent 1. G.P. for Revenue The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) th day of July two thousand and twenty six Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 19258 of 2026 ...Petitioner and f Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondent etitioner: Navuluru Krishna Sai espondents: The Court made the following: [3311] day of July two thousand and twenty six Petitioner Respondents 2 W.P.No.19258 of 2026 O R D E R: This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the action of the respondents Nos. 4 and 5 at the behest of the unofficial respondents are trying to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment over the subject property covered in Sy. No. 740 to an extent of Ac. 5.00 cents situated in Atluru Revenue village, Atluru mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa district without following the due process of law is illegal, arbitrary, irrational, apart from violative of principles of natural justice, violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere in respect of the subject property of the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner, briefly stated, is as follows: One Kaluvayi Gopalamma, the deceased mother of the petitioner is a beneficiary for grant of assignment and made an application for grant of assignment to the then revenue officials and a D.K.T. patta vide D.Dis.No. 99 / 79, dated 17.10.1979 was granted for the subject property. Then, she became the absolute owner and title holder of the subject property. The revenue officials issued pattadar pass books and title deeds in her favour and also made the entries in the manual revenue records. The respondent No. 4 also updated the entries in online revenue records. The petitioner’s father died in the year 1997 and his mother died in the year 2017. After the demise of the petitioner’s mother, the petitioner, being the legal heir, succeed the property and became the absolute owner of the property. As per the resettlement register, the subject survey number only consists of five acres which was allotted to the petitioner’s mother. The petitioner 3 W.P.No.19258 of 2026 cultivated the subject land. The unofficial respondents, who do not have any right, managed the revenue officials and got entered their names in the manual revenue records by getting the sub-division of the subject survey number. The petitioner submitted a representation, dated 24.04.2026 to the respondents, requesting the authorities to take appropriate legal action against the unofficial respondents. But, till date, no action has been taken against them. On 09.07.2026, the revenue officials themselves tried to interfere with the subject property at the behest of the unofficial respondents without issuing any notice. As such, this writ petition was filed. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue placed on record a copy of the written instructions of the respondent No. 5, dated 25.07.2026, which reads as follows: “It is submitted that the land in S.No. 740 consisting total an extent of Ac.5.00 cents of Atluru village of Atluru Mandal, however no further sub-divisions were made over the subject land. Further it is submitted that as seen from the present field status, out of an extent of Ac. 5.00 cents in S.No. 740 of Atluru village of Atluru Mandal the land to an extent of Ac. 0.75 cents was cultivated with neem trees and remaining extent i.e., Ac. 4.25 cents is vacant land. Finally, it is submitted that further necessary action in the matter will be taken after outcome of the judgment from the Hon’ble High Court of A.P., Amaravati.” 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested to dispose of the writ petition directing the official respondents to dispose of the 4 W.P.No.19258 of 2026 representation of the petitioner, dated 24.04.2026 within the time fixed by this Court. 5. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted to pass appropriate order. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No. 5 to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 24.04.2026, and if the same is not available, on submission of a fresh representation by the petitioner within one (1) week, and pass appropriate order by following due procedure of law within six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this petition shall stand closed. ___________________ B. S. BHANUMATHI, J Dt. 27.07.2026 Note: Issue CC by 29.07.2026. B/o PNV Whether the order is : Speaking No / Reasoned Yes Reportable No / Non-Reportable Yes