Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 67418 (MAD)

M.KAKKAPPA v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/3008/2026 · 2026-02-03

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 3008 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-02-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 3008 of 2026 1. M.Kakkappa Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector office of the District Collector, Krishangiri district 2.The District Revenue officer Office of the district Collector, Krishnagiri District 3.Sub collector office of the Sub collectorate office, Hosur Krishnagiri District 4.The Tahsildar Taluk office, Hosur, Krishnagiri district Respondent(s) PRAYER Direct the 1st respondent herein to consider and pass an order of petitioner representation dated 23.09.2024 within a time frame fixed by this Honble Court For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Lakshmanasamy For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Arumugam Govt Advocate For Respondent ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to reclassify https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3008 of 2026 the land morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition as “patta land” based on the petitioner’s representation dated 23.09.2024 within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that pursuant to UDR survey, the petitioner’s property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition has been erroneously classified as “Tharisu land”. The petitioner seeks for reclassification of the same as “patta land”. The petitioner had given a representation on 23.09.2024 to the second respondent, seeking for reclassification of the property as “patta land”. Since the said representation has not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. S.Arumugam, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation dated 23.09.2024 as stated supra is directed to be considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3008 of 2026 6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 23.09.2024, seeking for reclassification of the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition as “patta land” instead of “Tharisu land” within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. 03-02-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1.The District Collector office of the District Collector, Krishangiri district 2.The District Revenue officer Office of the district Collector, Krishnagiri District 3.Sub collector office of the Sub collectorate office, Hosur Krishnagiri District 4.The Tahsildar Taluk office, Hosur, Krishnagiri district https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3008 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab WP No. 3008 of 2026 03-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis