Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010095912026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1623/2026 SRI ADITYA BIHAR KANDOLI SON OF SRI GOPAL CH. KANDALI RESIDENT OF QTR NO-56, JEC, JORHAT PO PS-JORHAT DIST.-JORHAT, ASSAM VERSUS SRI NARAYAN KONWAR THE COMMISSIONER, GOVT. OF ASSAM, HIGHER EDUCATION TECHNICAL, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 2:SRI DHRUBAJYOTI BORAH THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-19 3:SRI RUPAM BARUAH THE PRINCIPAL JORHAT ENGINEERING COLLEGE JORHAT ASSAM 4:SRI JAYANTA NARLIKAR THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DISPUR GUWAHAT Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, HIGHER EDU, SC, FINANCE Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : Cont.Cas(C)/347/2020 ADITYA BIHAR KANDOLI S/O SRI GOPAL CH. KANDALI RESIDENT OF QTR NO. PO PS AND DIST JORHAT ASSAM VERSUS PREETOM SAIKIA AND 3 ORS. THE COMMISSIONER GOVT OF ASSAM HIGHER EDUCATION(TECHNICAL) DISPUR GUWAHATI 2:SRI ATUL BORA THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI 19 3:SRI REETA SARMAH THE PRINCIPAL JORHAT ENGINEERING COLLEGE JORHAT ASSAM 4:SRI SHYAM JAGANNATHAN THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM. HIGHER EDUCATION(FINANCE) DISPUR. GUWAHATI ------------ Advocate for : MR. P J SAIKIA Advocate for : MR. K GOGOI appearing for PREETOM SAIKIA AND 3 ORS. Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 25.05.2026 Heard Mr. P. J. Saikia, the learned counsel for the applicant. 2. By this application, the applicant has prayed for impleadment of the new incumbents, namely, Mr. Narayan Konwar, who had jointed in the post of Commissioner, Govt. of Assam, Higher Education Department as respondent no. 5, Sri Dhrubajyoti Borah, The Director of Technical Education, Assam, as respondent no. 6 and Mr. Rupam Baruah, The Principal, Jorhat Engineering College, as respondent no. 7 and Mr. Jayanta Narlikar, The Commissioner & Secretary, Govt. of Assam, (Finance) Department as respondent no. 8. 3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that all the other 4 respondents, i.e. respondent nos. 1 to 4 had retired or transferred. 4. As such, the impealding application is allowed. 5. The petitioner to file the amended Cause Title, amending the same in the contempt petition, being Contempt Case No. 347/2020. 6. This interlocutory application is accordingly disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant