Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6741 (CAL)

EMADUR RAHAMAN AND ANR v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA(P)/235/2022 · 2026-02-19

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19.02.2026 Item No.25 Ct. No.01 RP WPA (P) 235 of 2022 Emadur Rahaman & Anr. Vs. The Union of India & Ors. Mr. Jahar Lal De, Ld. AGP Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee Mr. Suddhadev Adak …..For State PER, SUJOY PAUL, CJ.: 1. None appears for the petitioners. 2. The State is represented by its learned counsels. 3. Since nobody entered appearance on 06.01.2026, the matter was listed under the heading “For Dismissal”. Nobody appears for the petitioners today also. 4. Mr. Dey, learned AGP for the State submits that the petitioners have statutory remedy under the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme, West Bengal, Grievance Redressal Rules, 2009 in respect of the relief claimed by them. 5. There is nobody to oppose the said contention. 2 6. The instant PIL is disposed of by reserving liberty to the petitioners to avail statutory remedy. [SUJOY PAUL, CJ.] [PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.]