Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Manipur · body

2026 DAILYLAW 674 (MAN)

Laishram Ibungo Singh and Anr v. Khundrakpam Samarendra Singh and Anr

MC(CRP(CRP Art.227)/49/2026 · 2026-07-28

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:MNHC:145-FB Item Nos. 10 & 11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL CRP(CRP.Art.227) No. 32 of 2026 With MC(CRP(CRP.Art.227)) No. 49 of 2026 1. Laishram Ibungo Singh, aged about 58 years, S/o Late L. Angou, a resident of Khangabok Mamang Leikai, P.O.& P.S Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur. 2. Laishram Rajesh Singh, aged about 34 years, S/o Laishram Ibungo Singh, a resident of Khangabok Mamang Leikai, P.O.& P.S Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur. Petitioner/s Vs. 1. Khundrakpam Samarendra Singh , aged about 46 years, S/o Late Kh. Maimu Singh, a resident of Khangabok Awang Leikai, presently residing at Thangmaieband Yumnam Leikai, Imphal West District, P.O & P.S Lamphel, Manipur and Anr. 2. Laishram Sadananda Singh, aged about 36 years, S/o Laishram Thambou Singh, a resident of Khangabok Bazar Awang Leikai, P.O.& P.S Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur Respondent/s With 1. Laishram Ibungo Singh, aged about 58 years, S/o Late L. Angou, a resident of Khangabok Mamang Leikai, P.O.& P.S Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur and Anr. 2. Laishram Rajesh Singh, aged about 34 years, S/o Laishram Ibungo Singh, a resident of Khangabok Mamang Leikai, P.O.& P.S Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur. Petitioner/s Vs. 1. Khundrakpam Samarendra Singh , aged about 46 years, S/o Late Kh. Maimu Singh, a resident of Khangabok Awang Leikai, presently residing at Thangmaieband Yumnam Leikai, Imphal West District, P.O & P.S Lamphel, Manipur. 2. Laishram Sadananda Singh, aged about 36 years, S/o Laishram Thambou Singh, a resident of Khangabok Bazar Awang Leikai, P.O.& P.S Thoubal, Thoubal District, Manipur Respondent/s BEFORE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR (ORDER) 29.07.2026 [1] Mr.Seityandra along with Ms. N. Kabita, learned counsel on record for revision petitioners is before this Court. [2] Ms. W. Anandita Chanu along Mr. Birendrajit and Ms. M. Pushpatolly, learned counsel for Caveator ( to be noted, first respondent has lodged caveat) is also before this Court. [3] After some arguments, Mr. L. Seityandra, learned counsel on record for revision petitioners sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned CRP (Civil Revision Petition) and captioned MC(Miscellaneous Case) thereat. In this regard, endorsements made by Mr. L. Seityandra, learned counsel on record for revision petitioners and MC applicants in case file are as follows: CRP(CRP Art.227) No.32 of 2026 MC(CRP(CRP Art.227) No.49 of 2026 Though obvious, it is made clear that suit in Trial Court along with interlocutory applications therein, (if any and/ or if filed post this order) will proceed on its own merits and in accordance with law untrammeled by instant withdrawal order. Though obvious, it is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any view or opinion on merits of the matter. [4] Captioned CRP and captioned MC thereat are disposed of as withdrawn/closed. There shall be no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE Ab. Surjit