Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6739 (ALL)

YUSUF v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/38274/2026 · 2026-09-10

Saurabh Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38274 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State. 2. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of Case Crime No.190 of 2016 (State of U.P. vs. Yusuf and others) under sections 398 & 401 I.P.C, Police Station Noida Sector-49, District Gautam Budh Nagar, pending in the court of learned Additional District Judge/Special Judge POCSO-2, Gautam Budh Nagar, including charge-sheet dated 25.02.2014 as well as non-bailable warrant issued against the applicant. 3. On perusal of entire record appended along with instant application, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned charge-sheet, non-bailable warrant and the entire proceedings of above-mentioned case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Thereafter, learned counsel for applicant submitted that liberty may be granted to applicant to surrender before the court concerned in pursuance to non-bailable warrant issued against him in this case, over which learned AGA has no objection. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, applicant is hereby directed to appear before the learned court concerned in pursuance to impugned non-bailable warrant issued against him within three weeks from today. Till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicant. After the expiry of aforesaid period of three weeks, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Yusuf .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) learned concerned court is directed to proceed as per law. 7. Lastly, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has already been granted bail in this case and as such learned court concerned may not compel him to prefer fresh bond and surety. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. September 11, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 38274 of 2026 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad