Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6736 (CAL)

MRIDUL BANERJEE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/9851/2025 · 2026-02-19

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20/02 2026 ADSL-04/24 266312 NANDY (OP) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA 9851 of 2025 Mridul Banerjee Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Sourav Mitra, Advocate Mr. Sudipta Maiti, Advocate …...for the Petitioner Mr. Parikshit Goswami, Advocate ……for the State 1. This matter has come up in the list at the instance of Mr. Parikshit Goswami, learned Advocate, on the pretext that even though he was requested by the Court to appear on behalf of the State on 19.02.2026 as there was no representation on behalf of the State, but there was no order to that effect. 2. Such being the position, office of the learned Government Pleader is requested to regularize the appointment of Mr. Parikshit Goswami, learned Advocate for the State in the instant writ-petition. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2