Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6735 (UTT)

VINOD KUMAR v. THE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPPIL/75/2026 · 2026-06-11

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4673-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY Writ Petition (PIL) No.75 of 2026 11th June, 2026 Vinod Kumar and Another -----Petitioners Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ----Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Ms. Deepa Arya, Ms. Rashi Sharma and Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Mr. Prashant Bhardwaj, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned Addl. Advocate General, learned counsel for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Aditya Pratap Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.5. Mr. Saurabh Adhikari, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.6/NMCA. Mr. Lalit Miglani, learned counsel for respondent no.7. ----------------------------------------------------------------- ORDER: (per Mr. Manoj Kumar Gupta C. J.) 1. Ms. Deepa Arya, learned counsel for the petitioners after making submissions for some time states that she is not pressing the writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 3. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C. J.) (SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 11.06.2026 SS 1