Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 11575 of 2026 Pranakrushna Padhan ..... Petitioner Mr. M. Pati, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC . CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 24.04.2026 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Even though a claim has been made to direct the Opp. Parties to give the benefit of rehabilitation appointment in favour of the Petitioner but since it is not disputed that no application in the prescribed format has yet been submitted, it is the view of this Court that the Writ Petition is not maintainable. It is open for the Petitioner to make his application in the prescribed format for its consideration. 4. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti