Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6733 (UTT)

SAHNAWAJ v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE HARIDWAR

WPMS/1256/2026 · 2026-06-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4616 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/1256/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Tarun Lakhera, Brief Holder for the State/respondent no. 1. 3. Modh. Shafy, Advocate for respondent no. 2. 4. Petitioner is permitted to implead Waqf Board, Uttarakhand Dehradun through its Chief Executive Officer as respondent no. 3. 5. Amended memo of parties be filed during the course of the day. 6. According to petitioner, he has moved a representation to the Chairman, Uttarakhand Waqf Board for constituting a committee for managing affairs of a Maszid. He submits that decision has not been taken on the representation, which was submitted on 16.04.2026. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the Waqf Board submits that petitioner has made representation to an authority other than competent authority. He submits that if petitioner has any grievance, then he can approach the Chief Executive Officer by making representation. 2026:UHC:4616 8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation. If he makes representation to the competent authority within two weeks, decision thereupon shall be taken by the competent authority, as per law, within eight weeks thereafter. 9. Certified copy of this order shall be issued only upon supply of amended memo of parties by petitioner’s counsel. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.06.2026 Navin