[2026:RJ-JP:11296] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 398/2026 Sandeep Kumar S/o Kamlesh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Mored, Police Station Manpur, District Dausa (Rajasthan) (At present in the District Jail Bandikui) ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amitabh Vijayvargia For Respondent(s) : Mr. J.P. Tiwari, PP For Complainant : Mr. Arvind Balut with Mr. Ajay Pal Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 17/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 237/2025 registered at Police Station Manpur District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 124(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Present is the second bail application filed on behalf of the accused-applicant. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is a young person, aged about 21 years. It is further submitted that the co-accused has already been enlarged on bail and that the applicant is behind bars since 12.10.2025. It is next submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter. Further, it is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents pending against the applicant. It is also submitted that the present dispute arises out of cross FIRs registered between close relatives. It is further submitted that the [2026:RJ-JP:11296] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-398/2026] applicant has been visually impaired since birth, and the alleged acts attributed to him did not caused any grievous injury. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned Public Prosecutor have opposed the instant bail application and have submitted that heinous allegations of attempt to murder have been levelled upon the applicant on account of throwing chemical substance upon the victim, namely Dharmsingh, and consequently the victim has lost his eyesight. It is also that the case of the applicant is distinguished from the case of co-accused as the said injuries sustained by the victim are specifically attributed to the present applicant. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the fact that heinous allegations of attempt to murder have been levelled upon the applicant; that allegedly the victim has lost his eyesight on account of throwing chemical substance by the applicant; that the case of the applicant is distinguished from the case of co-accused; that the injuries sustained by the victim are attributed to the applicant, looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 5. Accordingly, the present second bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-140