S P Y AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/1299/2026 · 2026-04-15
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 673 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 673 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010019382026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.1299 of 2026 Between:
1. S P Y AGRO INDUSTRIES LIMITED, REP BY ITS DIRECTOR, S.SUJALA R/O NEW INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, SY. NO. 514, PART OF APIIC, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT-518 502, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
REVENUE (EXCISE) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
ANDHRA PRADESH, 522238.
2. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE BEVERAGES CORPORATION LIMITED, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, GOLLAPUDI ,VIJAYAWADA,ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus Declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in withholding the amount of rupees 2,68,20,194 (two Crore sixty-eight lacks twenty thousand one ninety four rupees is illegal, arbitrary contrary to the procedure prescribed under the G.O.Ms.No.414 Dt 27.05.2022 and violative of article 14 ,19(1)(g) constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay an amount of rupees 2,68,20,194 (two Crore sixty-eight lacks twenty thousand one ninety four rupees) with interest of rupees 6,71,52,387 (Six Crore Seventy- One Lakh fifty-Two Thousand Three hundred eighty-Seven) @18percentage per annum.
2
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S APPADHARA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE
2. SATISH BABU RAMINENI SC For APBCL and APSBCL for Rayalaseema region, NLR, PRK
The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition and to grant liberty to question the proceedings dated 24.02.2026 of the 2nd respondent and he also endorsed the same on the bundle. The said proceedings dated 24.02.2026 were issued on the directions issued by this Court dated
20.01.2026.
Permission is accorded and accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the writ petitioner to assail the proceedings dated 24.02.2026 in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 16.04.2026
siva
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.1299 of 2026
Date: 16.04.2026
siva