[2026:RJ-JP:12558] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14066/2025 Bhajanlal @ Bhujiya S/o Bhoop Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 8, Palota, Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. (At present lodge at Sub Jail Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Applicant Versus State of Rajasthan through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Yadav with Mr. Rajesh Kumar Yadav Mr. Lucky Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 25/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 on behalf of the accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 359/2024 registered at Police Station Singhana, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Section 103(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is a young man, aged about 32 years, and is the sole bread earner of his family. It is further submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. The prosecution's story alleges that the applicant intoxicated the victim-deceased with liquor and subsequently drowned him in water. However, it is submitted that the entire case of the prosecutions rests upon weak circumstantial evidence, specifically the mere recovery of a boot from the applicant and a pyajama from the co-accused. It is next submitted that the complainant has not attributed any specific motive to the applicant for the [2026:RJ-JP:12558] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14066/2025] alleged offence, and the statements of the material witnesses have already been recorded. It is lastly submitted that the applicant has been in custody since long, and that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application and has submitted that incriminating articles have been recovered from the applicant and that the allegations of heinous offence have been levelled against the applicant. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that the applicant is a young man, aged about 32 years; that the applicant is sole bread earner of his family; that the applicant has been in prolonged custody since long; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the applicant, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Bhajanlal @ Bhujiya S/o Bhoop Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/35