ASAB @ ASAF @ CHINTA S/O JAISINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3392/2026 · 2026-03-18
Ravi Chirania
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6726 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6726 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11674] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.3392/2026 Asab @ Asaf @ Chinta S/o Jaisingh, aged about 50 years, R/o Ghatmika Police Station Pahari District Deeg. (At present petitioner confined in Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Khan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order 18/03/2026
1. This misc. bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner Asab @ Asaf @ Chinta S/o Jaisingh, aged about 50 years. The petitioner has been arrested by the police on 13.02.2026 in connection with the impugned FIR bearing No.14/2022 dated 13.01.2022 registered at Police Station Sikri District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 332, 353, 307 of IPC and Sections 5 & 8 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act and Section 3, 25 of the Arms Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has not committed any such offences. Learned counsel further submitted that co-accused persons, namely Tahir and Sahbu @ Sahbuddeen have already been enlarged on bail under Section
[2026:RJ-JP:11674] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3392/2026] 483 B.N.S.S. by Co-ordinate Benches of this Court passed in SBCRLMB Nos.2351/2022 and 12449/2025 vide orders dated 15.02.2022 and 26.09.2025 respectively for the aforesaid offences. Learned counsel further submitted that as far as the criminal antecedents recorded in the bail rejection order of the learned Trial Court are concerned, in one case the petitioner has been acquitted and in another case, the parties have compromised the dispute between them, therefore, no serious offence is pending against the petitioner as on date. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application. 4. Be that as it may. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and taking into account that the co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Benches of this Court and that the petitioner has been acquitted and the dispute have been settled in the earlier cases, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner - Asab @ Asaf @ Chinta S/o Jaisingh on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Asab @ Asaf @ Chinta S/o Jaisingh shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called
[2026:RJ-JP:11674] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3392/2026] upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. 7.
It is further directed that in case, the petitioner is found to be involved in any case within two years from the date of passing of this order, learned Public prosecutor shall file an application for cancellation of the bail. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 47 - RAVI KHANDELWAL