WP No. 3575 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY WP No. 3575 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.4006 of 2026 Tamil Maanila Kattida Thozhilalar Sangam, Rep. by its Treasurer E. John, 7/R, 86A, 10th Main Road, Muthamizh Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai - 600 118. ..Petitioner Vs 1. Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Labour and Employment, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. Commissioner of Labour, Department of Labour and Employment, DMS Compound, Anna Saalai, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018. 3. Joint Commissioner of Labour -I, Department of Labour and Employment, DMS Compound, Anna Saalai, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018. 4. M. Subbu @ Subramani 5. A. Kathirvel ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records of the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A3/2869/2023 dated 23.07.2025 issued by the third respondent and to quash the same and direct to conduct proper enquiry and accept the E-Form submitted by the Tamil Maanila Kattida Thozhilalar Sangam https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3575 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 and reject the E-Form submitted with anomalies by the fifth respondent as unlawful. For Petitioner: Mr.T.Sivagnanasambandan For Respondents: Mr.A.M.Ayyadurai Government Advocate for R1 to R3 ORDER This writ petition is filed with a prayer to quash the impugned order dated 23.07.2025 and to conduct a proper enquiry, accept the E-form submitted by the Tamil Maanila Kattida Thozhilalar Sangam and reject the E-form submitted by the fifth respondent. 2. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and perusing the material records of the case, it can be seen that there is a dispute between the present Treasurer, Mr.E.John, who represents the Tamil Maanila Kattida Thozhilalar Sangam and the fifth respondent, as well as one M.Subbu @ Subramani and other persons. It can also be seen that a civil suit has already been filed by the petitioner himself in O.S. No.3395 of 2022 on the file of the XVII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai and the same is pending. 3. When the dispute is essentially as to who was properly elected and the matter is seized of by the Civil Court, instead of approaching this Court for the relief of recording the e-form, an interlocutory application can be filed before the same Court in which the dispute is pending. The Civil Court, upon https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3575 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 considering the prima facie case on behalf of the petitioner or the M.Subbu @ Subramani group, can issue interim directions to the statutory authorities to accept the e-form either filed by the plaintiff in the suit or the first defendant in the suit and accordingly the authorities shall abide by the same. Even otherwise, when the civil suit comes to an end pursuant to the decree, the authority shall register the e-forms, as per the decree. 4. With the said liberty reserved to the petitioner to move the Civil Court, this writ petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. No costs. 06-02-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No NSL To 1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Labour and Employment, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009. 2. The Commissioner of Labour, Department of Labour and Employment, DMS Compound, Anna Saalai, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018. 3. The Joint Commissioner of Labour -I, Department of Labour and Employment, DMS Compound, Anna Saalai, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 3575 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. NSL WP No. 3575 of 2026 06-02-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis