Mayanglambam Mangijaobi Devi v. Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences JNIMS and 61 others
MC(WA)/39/2026 · 2026-07-27
A Guneshwar Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 672 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 672 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
P a g e 1 | 5
Item No. 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
MC(WA) No. 39 of 2026 (Ref.: W.A. No. 87 of 2022)
Mayanglambam Mangijaobi Devi, aged about 48 years, W/o Sagapam Ibomcha, resident of Khurai Konsam Leikai, P.O. Lamlong, P.S. Porompat and Imphal East District, Manipur – 795010. … Applicant - Versus -
1. Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences Society Manipur represented by its Director (JNIMS), Porompat, Imphal East, Manipur & 61 Ors. 2. The Chairman, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, Porompat, Imphal East, Manipur. … Official Respondents
3. Ch. Mamata Devi. 4. Th. Satyabhama Devi. 5. N. Jenny Devi. 6. O. Omila Devi. 7. K. Dhrubatara. 8. P. Jeena Devi. 9. N. Babyrose Devi. 10. Ph. Janapriya Devi
11. L. Dayaton. 12. Charis Thapa. 13. A. Yaralkumari. 14. W. Ranjita Devi. 15. H. Dhanabati Devi. 16. Sushila Thokchom. 17. K. Bidyalakshmi Sharma
18. L. Poda Devi. 19. M. Brajeshwori Devi. 20. N. Jogeta Devi. 21. A. Sanatombi Devi. 22. M. Anushwori Devi. 23. Kh. Ibemma. P a g e 2 | 5
24. H. Shayarani Chanu. 25. L. Bimola Devi. 26. O. Sangeeta Devi. 27. H. Rajshree Devi. 28. M. Sophia Devi. 29. L. Sanjarani Devi. 30. Th. Nirmala Devi. 31. Anjana Ngangbam. 32. Kh. Premabati Devi. 33. S. Memthoibi Devi. 34. O. Mirabai Devi. 35. L. Bijuli Devi. 36. R.K. Priyalakshmi Devi. 37. P. Juliet. 38. Th. Memcha Devi. 39. Leishna Laishram Devi. 40. Kh. Triveni Devi. 41. T. Narmada Devi. 42. Th. Shiroilily Devi. 43. L. Bhanumati Devi. 44. Kh. Sandhyarani Devi. 45. Th. Vumika Devi. 46. Sanjeev Singh Okram. 47. O. Bijiyaluxmi Devi. 48. Ch. Binapani Devi. 49. Y. Victoria Devi. 50. Th. Rebita Devi. 51. Rina Phijam. 52. Vungngaihdin Paite. 53. Shining Maku. 54. D. Muiran Maring. 55. Lhingnu Hangshing. 56. Themlaldin Gangte. 57. D. Toshangphun Maring. 58. N. Ranjeeta. 59. G. Jacinta Moses. 60. Chongboi Gangte
…. Private Respondents
61. The State of Manipur through the Commissioner (Health & FW), Govt. of Manipur, Secretariat North Block, P.O. & P.S. Imphal, Imphal West District, Manipur-795001. P a g e 3 | 5
62. The Director of Health Services, Govt. of Manipur, Lamphelpat, P.O. & P.S. Lamphel, Imphal West District, Manipur-795004. …. State Respondents
B E F O R E HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR HON’BLE MR.
JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
O R D E R [M. Sundar, CJ]
28.07.2026
[1]
Mr. S. Johnson, learned counsel representing learned counsel on record for ‘Miscellaneous Case’ (‘MC’ for the sake of brevity and convenience) applicant, Mr. Phungyo Zingkhei, learned State counsel on record for respondent Nos. 1, 2, 61 and 62, Mr. Rendy Maibam, learned counsel representing learned counsel on record for respondent Nos. 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 52, 53, 55 and 60, Mr. U. Augusta,
learned counsel representing learned counsel on record for respondent Nos. 3, 7, 11, 54, 56, 57 and 59, Mr. Ch. Momon, learned counsel on record for respondent Nos. 41 to 45, 47 to 51 and Ms. Malemleima,
learned counsel representing learned counsel on record for respondent Nos. 12 to 18, 20, 22 to 28, 30 to 32, 34 to 40 and 58 are before this Court (Physical Court). P a g e 4 | 5
As regards respondent Nos. 19, 33 and 46, steps have been taken, service has been duly effected but they have neither chosen to enter appearance through counsel nor come before this Court (either in the Physical Court or on the Video Conferencing (VC) platform). [2]
Mr. S. Johnson, learned counsel representing learned counsel on record for MC applicant submits that respondent Nos. 21 and 29 in W.A. No. 87 of 2022 remain unserved and that has necessitated instant application. [3]
Mr. Kh. Tarunkumar, learned senior advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. S. Johnson, learned counsel for MC applicant submits that captioned MC viz., MC(WA) No. 39 of 2026 has been taken out with a prayer to allow applicant to serve respondent Nos. 21 and 29 in W.A. No. 87 of 2022 by resorting to Dasti Service or Speed Post. [4]
Prayer in captioned MC(WA) No. 39 of 2026 reads as follows: ‘PRAYER
(i) allow the applicant/writ appellant to take steps upon Respondent no. 21 and 29 by way of Dasti Service or speed post. (ii) pass any other appropriate order/direction that this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper.’
[5]
Though the prayer seeks permission to serve by resorting to Dasti Service or Speed Post, learned senior counsel for MC applicant
P a g e 5 | 5
submits that it is desirable to order Dasti Service alone. Learned senior counsel further submits that though prayer does not mention WA number, it is for effecting service qua R21 and R29 in W.A. No. 87 of
2022. This submission is recorded. [6]
Captioned MC which is of the year 2026 is in pending writ appeal of the year 2022. Registry ought not to have processed and numbered the captioned MC without this being clearly mentioned in the cause-title as well as in the prayer. Registrar (Judicial) is directed to enquire into the matter, fix the responsibility and place a note before Chief Justice on the administrative side. [7]
Considering the innocuous nature of the prayer, the same is not opposed by respondents.
[8]
Captioned MC(WA) No. 39 of 2026 is allowed/ordered making it clear that MC applicant is allowed to take steps to effect service on respondent Nos. 21 and 29 in W.A. No. 87 of 2022 by resorting to Dasti Service, returnable by 08.09.2026. [9]
Captioned MC application is disposed of in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE Bipin
KHOIROM BIPINCHAN DRA SINGH Digitally signed by KHOIROM BIPINCHANDRA SINGH Date: 2026.07.30 19:04:09 +05'30'