Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6719 (BOM)

PURUSHOTTAM MAHADEORAO SHENMARE AND OTHERS v. STATE OF MAH.,THR. VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT DEPT., THR. SECY., MUMBAI AND ANOTHER

WP/3967/2026 · 2026-09-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 32-WP-3967-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3967/2026 PURUSHOTTAM MAHADEORAO SHENMARE AND OTHERS VS STATE OF MAH.,THR. VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT DEPT., THR. SECY., MUMBAI AND ANOTHER --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S.D. Chopde, Advocate for the Petitioner (s). Mr. O.R. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Mr. A.V. Palshikar, AGP, for the Respondent No.1. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 07, 2026. 1. Heard. 2. The prayer is to direct the respondent-Authorities to consider the representations dated 10.06.2024 and 14.10.2024 and thereby to grant the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme in view of the Government Resolution dated 01.10.2024. 3. Learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2, on instructions, submits that the representations will be considered and taken to logical end within three weeks from today. 4. Statement is accepted. 5. The petitioners are satisfied with the development. 6. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kartikeya 2026:BHC-NAG:11800-DB