Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6716 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD RAZZAK v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/2180/2026 · 2026-09-13

Arun Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2180 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. Sri Pankaj Kumar Gupta has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha. 2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no. 4 to decide Case No. 03289/2020 bearing T202017630303289 (State Vs. Peer Mohammad), arising out of proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the proceeding under Section 67 of the Code is pending against the illegal encroachers since the year 2020 and the matter is being lingered on at the behest of the encroachers. 4. In view of the aforesaid, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction upon the respondent no. 4 to decide the pending proceedings, as noticed above, by passing appropriate order, in accordance with law, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of one month from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. September 14, 2026 Ranjeet Sahu Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Murtaza Khan, Mohammad Mustafa Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Kumar Gupta (Arun Kumar,J.) Mohammad Razzak .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RANJEET SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad