HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36488 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. After hearing Sri Nigmendra Shukla, learned counsel for petitioner, the Court does not find any reason to interfere with impugned order. 2. However, still there will be an opportunity for parties compromise agreement to come forward and verify the compromise entered between them as per the observations made in impugned order and in case the parties appears, the concerned Permanent Lok Adalat will verify the compromise and pass an order in accordance with law. 3. With aforesaid observations, this writ petition is disposed of. September 14, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nigamendra Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Athar Raza .....Petitioner(s) Permanent Lok Adalat And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad