Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6712 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA @ MONU @ BACCHIYA S/O MAHIPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3908/2026 · 2026-03-27

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12938] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3908/2026 Rajendra @ Monu @ Bacchiya S/o Mahipal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Rava, Police Station Khetri, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 27/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 10/2026 registered at Police Station Mehada, District Jhunjhunu for offence(s) under Sections 318(4) & 316(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed. He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since long; trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in the custody and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the submissions made by [2026:RJ-JP:12938] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3908/2026] the learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that there are eight other criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is already enlarged on bail in other cases instituted against him. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; petitioner is behind the bars since long; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Rajendra @ Monu @ Bacchiya S/o Mahipal is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in a month in the concerned police station. 8. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. [2026:RJ-JP:12938] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3908/2026] 9. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/79