Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 67111 (MAD)

Vignesh @ Vicky v. The state rep by its The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/1542/2026 · 2026-01-27

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 1542 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 1542 of 2026 1. Vignesh @ Vicky S/o Ramamoorthy No.225B, Suriya Nagar Mettu Street, Kotturpuram Chennai-600085. and another 2. Mohanraj S/o Murugan, No.228, Kunru Mettu Street, Sirumathur Post, Padappai, Kanchipuram District 601 301 Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The state rep by its The Inspector of Police Padappai Police Sation, Kanchipuram District. Crime No. 4/2026. Respondent(s) PRAYER To enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in the above Crime No. 4 of 2026 on the file of Padappai Police Station, Kanchipuram District and pass such other or further orders as this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Magesh D For Respondent(s): M/S.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 1542 of 2026 296(b), 329(3), 115(2), 109(1), 351(3) of BNS and section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act in Crime No. 4 of 2026, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners joined hands with three other accused and due to previous enmity, attacked the defacto complainant with a knife and caused severe injuries. Hence, the case has been registered. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent person, and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution, and they have been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity. Therefore, he prays for grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioners are ranked as A1 and A2 respectively and they have bad antecedents of 2 and 5 previous cases respectively. She further submitted that the investigation is pending. Hence, opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 1542 of 2026 5. Considering the fact that both the petitioners have bad antecedents and it is also a case of using a knife and attacking in a public place, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 27-01-2026 Mpa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The state rep by its The Inspector of Police Padappai Police Sation, Kanchipuram District. Crime No. 4/2026. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 1542 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP No. 1542 of 2026 27-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis