Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:11289
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 1826 of 2026
Dallu Sheikh @ Dullu SK, Son of Late Tamu Sheikh
… … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… … Opp. Party
---
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Virendra Kumar, Advocate
Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Advocate
For the Opp. Party
: Ms. Lily Sahay, Advocate
---
04/18th April 2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Radha Nagar P.S. Case No. 275/2025 corresponding to G.R. No. 700/2025 for the offence registered under Section 69, 89, 70(1), 351(2) of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Court, C.A.W., Rajmahal.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the named co-accused Minu Sk @ Munna Sk has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 9520/2025 vide order dated 30.10.2025. He submits that the co-accused is alleged to have established physical relationship with the victim, who is a major lady and later on co-accused refused to marry. The learned counsel submits that there is no cogent material connecting the petitioner with the alleged offence.
3.
Learned counsel for the opposite party while opposing the prayer has referred to the counter-affidavit and has submitted that in paragraph 7 of the supplementary case diary, the petitioner and the victim were found to be telephonically in touch with each other on 15.07.2025 and 17.07.2025 and as per production-cum-seizure list of pen drive produced
2026:JHHC:11289
2
by the victim, the petitioner had threatened her to marry the co-accused and not to lodge a case against co-accused.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that the co-accused has been granted bail by this court, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-I-cum-Spl. Court, C.A.W., Rajmahal in connection with Radha Nagar P.S. Case No. 275/2025, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below.
5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions.
6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Dated: 18.04.2026
Uploaded On:
Mukul/-