HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9011 of 2026 Court No. - 66 (Sr. No.3 out of 116) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sanjay Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. This is the second bail application on behalf of the applicant. The first one was rejected by this Court vide order dated 12.08.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.27329 of 2024. 4. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.0244 of 2023, under Sections 498- A, 304-B I.P.C. and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Azeem Nagar, District Rampur, during the pendency of trial. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the trial is almost at its logical end, as the statement of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. has already been recorded, I do not find it a fit case for grant of bail to the applicant. The bail application is found devoid of merits and is, accordingly, rejected. 6. However, it is directed that the aforesaid case pending before the trial court be decided expeditiously as early as possible in view of the principle as has been laid down in the recent judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Vinod Kumar vs. State of Punjab; 2015 (3) SCC 220 and Hussain and Another vs. Union of India; (2017) 5 SCC 702, if there is no legal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ahmad Hasan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) impediment. 7. It is clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the facts brought in by the parties pertaining to the disposal of bail application and the said observations shall have no bearing on the merits of the case during trial. March 19, 2026 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 9011 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad