Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6709 (PAT)

Laloo kumar @ Gyanshu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./18543/2026 · 2026-03-18

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18543 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2024 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== Laloo kumar @ Gyanshu Kumar S/O Mithilesh Kumar R/O Village- Khapura, P.S- Paliganj, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rahul Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Matloob Rab, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 18-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 453 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Section 310(2) of the BNS. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that while the informant was returning home from marriage ceremony in a car along with his companions, 5-6 unknown miscreants riding on two bikes intercepted him. The miscreants looted mobile and cash of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During course of investigation one Sunny Kumar has given his confessional statement and the name of this petitioner has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18543 of 2026(2) dt.18-03-2026 2/2 surfaced in the confessional statement of Sunny. Save and except the confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. It has further been submitted that similarly situated co-accused Surajbhan has been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Co-ordinate Bench vide Cr. Misc. No. 40020 of 2025. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the bail of the petitioner. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 453 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Danapur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T