Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010100622026 2026:GAU-AS:7348 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1103/2026 RIYADUL TARIK S/O-MD. INAMUL HOQUE, VILL.-NO.1 BORGHULI, P.O.-BORGHULI SAPMAR, P.S.-ULUANI, DIST.-NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782120 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM , REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED P.P., ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S AHMED, MR M RAHMAN,T UDDIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 27-05-2026 Heard Mr. S Ahmed, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D P Goswami, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of State respondent. Page No.# 2/3 2. This is an application u/s 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 for granting pre-arrest bail to the accused petitioner in connection with Rowta P.S. Case No. 01/2025 u/s 87/75(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 corresponding to PRC Case No. 202/2025 (G.R. Case No. 06/2025) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Udalguri. 3. It is submitted by Mr. Ahmed that initially one missing entry was made by the informant before Rowta police station. But, on the next date itself the victim was recovered and on the missing entry the case was registered and the statement of the victim also recorded u/s 183 BNSS. But, the present petitioner is not aware about registration of any case against him as the victim was immediately recovered on the next date of lodging of the missing entry. But, subsequently he came to know that charge-sheet has been filed showing him as absconder. But, during investigation police never enquired about him and for that he is not at all aware about registration of the FIR as well as filing of the charge-sheet. However, he is still ready and willing to appear before the learned Trial Court below and to contest the case, if some protection is provided to him. 5. Mr. Goswami, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner may be directed to appear before the learned Trial Court below with an appropriate application for bail. 6. Hearing the entire submissions made by learned counsel for both sides and considering other aspects of the case, this Court is of opinion that some interim protection may be provided to the present petitioner, till he appears before the learned Trial Court with a regular bail application, which may be considered in accordance with law. Page No.# 3/3 7. In view of this, the petitioner is hereby directed to appear before the learned Trial Court below within 15 (fifteen) days from the date of order and till 15 days, no coercive action shall be taken against the present petitioner. 8. With the above observations, the present anticipatory bail application stands rejected and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant