[2026:RJ-JP:15840] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5189/2026 1. Managing Director, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Power House, Hathi Bhata, Ajmer. 2. Assistant Engineer (O And M), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Madar, Ajmer ----Petitioners Versus 1. Sandhya Khatri, Wife Of Shri Krishna Gopal Khatri, Ambe Park Colony, Near Royal Enfield Service Centre, Opposite Ladpura Puliya, National Highway, Ghughra, Ajmer 2. District Magistrate, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Muskan Harlalka for Ms. Anuradha For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 16/04/2026 1. The present petition has been filed assailing the impugned order dated 18.09.2025 passed by the learned Permanent Lok Adalat, Ajmer, whereby the petitioners were directed to shift the transformer without charging any fee from the respondent- applicant. 2. Having heard the contentions put forth by the learned counsel, and upon scanning the material available on record, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the instant matter, for the reasons noted hereinbelow: 2.1 That the scope of interference of this Court is minuscule and need to invoke the writ or extraordinary jurisdiction of this [2026:RJ-JP:15840] (2 of 4) [CW-5189/2026] Court is limited. It is opined that invoking such jurisdiction under constitutional provisions, warrants apparent malafides, arbitrariness and illegality. 2.2 That in the matter at hand there is no apparent illegality and that the learned Permanent Lok Adalat upon assiduous scanning of the vital aspects of the matter at hand has given its conscience opinion. The relevant upheld opinion of the order dated 18.09.2025 is reproduced herein under: "8. हे. उभयप्ቌों के तक - वितक पर गनन  प्ቔाली पर उपल्ቓ सम्ቜ द्ቜाेजात अविभलेखों  साኚ᭻ का गहनता से अ्ቖयन करने के प्ቐात् हम सभी सस्ቜवित से इस विन्ቌ्ቧ पर पहुंचते हैं विक ह्ቜगत ्ቚकरण में विाविदत ट्रांसफामर का इं्቗ालेशन ्ቚाቕኍ3या के आास विनमाण के प्ቐात् विकया मቕኍा। विजसके कारण आासीय उपयोग में बा቗ኋा तቕኍा संभावित जीन- संपवि8 के विलए जोखिखम भी उ्቎्ቐ हो सकता है तቕኍा ्ቚाቕኍ3या की ओर से जो ्ቚमाण के रूप में फोटो / द्ቜाेज ्ቚ्ቜुत विकए हैं, विजससे यह आंकलन विकया जा सकता है विक साजविनक सुर्ቌा का विहत ्ቚभावित हो रहा है। उ्ሹ ट्रांसफामर की ्ቝापना विबना उविचत विनयोजन के की गई है, विजस, ्ቔुविट के विलए ्ቚाቕኍ3या से शु्ቇ सूलना कतई ्቗ायसंगत नहीं है। अतः उ्ሹ ट्रांसफामर को विबना विकसी ्ቚकार के शु्ቇ सूली के सुरवि्ቌत ्ቝान पर ्ቝानांतरिरत / विश्ቊ विकए जाने का आदेश विकया जाना ्቗ायोविचत ्ቚतीत होता है।" 2.3 That the amount as awarded by the learned Permanent Lok Adalat is justified vis-a-vis the facts and circumstances of the matter at hand and the same ought not to be interfered by the High Court, under its supervisory or writ jurisdiction, as this Court is of a considered opinion that for redressal and awarding such amount, minute disputed question of facts are need to be examined and the High Court is not an appropriate forum to carry [2026:RJ-JP:15840] (3 of 4) [CW-5189/2026] out the said exercise. It is also noteworthy that the orders passed by the learned Permanent Lok Adalat are binding, conclusive, and final in nature, as per the scheme and objective of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, more specifically Section 22E, which is reproduced as under: "22E. Award of Permanent Lok Adalat to be final.—(1) Every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act made either on merit or in terms of a settlement agreement shall be final and binding on all the parties thereto and on persons claiming under them. (2) Every award of the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be deemed to be a decree of a civil court. (3) The award made by the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be by a majority of the persons constituting the Permanent Lok Adalat. (4) Every award made by the Permanent Lok Adalat under this Act shall be final and shall not be called in question in any original suit, application or execution proceeding. (5) The Permanent Lok Adalat may transmit any award made by it to a civil court having local jurisdiction and such civil court shall execute the order as if it were a decree made by that court." 3. In summation of the abovenoted, it can be jot down that the orders passed by the learned Permanent Lok Adalat, ought not to be judicially reviewed unless there is apparent arbitrariness or the order is ex facie non speaking; that when the amount awarded is justified, and the order passed by the learned Permanent Lok Adalat covers all the parameters of vital consideration and circumstances, rather is sans any perversity, arbitrariness, [2026:RJ-JP:15840] (4 of 4) [CW-5189/2026] violation of natural justice, malafides; that as per the mandate of Section 22E of the governing statute, which makes it categorically clear that the orders passed by the learned Permanent Lok Adalat are conclusive and final in nature, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition. 4. In view of the aforementioned, the instant petition is dismissed being bereft of any merits and there exist no apparent arbitrariness in the order impugned. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /31